Amanita Design is a small Czech studio that has carved a unique niche for itself very long time ago. The original Samorost was less of an adventure game and more of a “virtual interactive playground”, where you had to do certain things to progress, but the fun was in the visuals, sounds and fun animations. But it wasn’t until Machinarium of 2009, that was their first commercial release, that they’ve achieved fame, and that game was far more of a conventional puzzle focused point and click adventure. Since then they’ve gone back and forth – sometimes focusing more on the playful interactions and fun, sometimes attempting to make a puzzle game and as far as my preferences go – I always liked them being more fun and playful. Chuchel and Botanicula remain their best titles in my eyes, but nonetheless I do like to check everything they do just to enjoy the visuals and the music. Phonopolis is, unfortunately for me, a puzzle focused release. But I still liked it enough.
Tag: game review
In love with: Persona 3 Reload
Oh hey, it’s Persona 3. Again. But is anyone surprised, given how important this particular entry is? Not just for Persona sub-series, but for the general Megami Tensei franchise. Inventive mix of life simulation and turn-based party-based RPG dungeon crawling. Memorable story and characters. Unforgettable soundtrack. I’ve always had plenty of criticism for the game, but even I couldn’t resist wanting to play it again. Despite saying that I won’t do that 3 years ago after finally completing a playthrough of Persona 3 Portable. Persona 3 Reload is great. Easily my first pick for Persona game recommendation as of now in fact (yep, over Persona 5 Royal and Persona 4 Golden). But it’s not without flaws and downgrades.
Sad about: The Tragedy at Deer Creek
Sometimes you play a game and feel like it was a huge waste of potential. Not as a dig at the developers, but as a… great sadness? I guess? That the project clearly had a vision behind it, but the end result just wasted all of it. The Tragedy at Deer Creek is such a game. Despite being a relatively cheap independent title, the beginning of the game shows huge promise – wonderful visual style, moody atmosphere, good music. And after a short while, that doesn’t actually explain why the main character is doing what she’s doing, you even get hints of a cool mystery. But all of that is wasted, because as an adventure game it doesn’t work well, as a story-driven game it doesn’t work well and even as just a story it doesn’t know how to end properly.
Thoughts on: Bubsy 4D
Bubsy has spent the last three decades of game history as a punchline to a bad joke. The series started as a “mascot platformer” in the early 90s, trying to chase gameplay feats of Mario and Sonic, as so many other similar games did, and the first couple of games had positive reviews at the time. Now, I personally haven’t liked a single Bubsy game until now and retrospective reviews seem to often write even the first titles off as mediocre games, but at the time Bubsy was just one of many. And not even the worst at being a mascot. But then in 1996 Bubsy 3D came out and nothing has ever been the same for the poor bobcat, who wasn’t as annoying as many people love to say. However, the game was hot garbage and so the franchise basically died with it.
After several rather bizarre attempts at revitalizing the series over the last decade, Bubsy 4D is a success. And while it’s not a great 3D platformer, it’s quite good if you like this sort of game. Which sort? I’ll try to explain.
Thoughts on: Fatal Frame II: Crimson Butterfly REMAKE
After getting the slightly updated late ports of the fifth and fourth entries in the Fatal Frame franchise, it feels a bit odd to then get a full on remake of the second title. I mean, it clearly made sense for Koei Tecmo – they saw the current popularity of remakes, they saw how Konami remade “the hottest one” of the Silent Hill series and decided to follow suit. And it’s not like they didn’t do it before – Fatal Frame II has already been remade once with the Wii release of the game (also known as Deep Crimson Butterfly) and this new remake does inherit some of the elements from that earlier remake… But people seem to be buying it up and requesting more remakes, instead of re-releases or remasters, because, I guess, they secretly hate the original games and don’t want to play them.
Ugh. I’m going off on a tangent here. Point is, we have a second remake of the most popular entry in the Fatal Frame series. And it does a lot of things right, but also many things wrong. It’s kind of a mess that I couldn’t enjoy, despite really wanting to.
Read more“Thoughts on: Fatal Frame II: Crimson Butterfly REMAKE”
Happy about: Wicked Seed
Back in 1998, at the peak of their creative input in the 1990s, SquareSoft has released a game called Parasite Eve. A “cinematic RPG” that combined a lot of the game systems they’ve been using at the time, with an exciting story-driven action blockbuster production. The game is still, despite its flaws, beloved by many and there has never been anything quite like it – even the direct sequel of the game, that I happen to love even more, was a very different beast, leaning a lot more into classic survival horror mechanics. So, unsurprisingly, it has been mostly up to independent developers of recent years to try and recapture the magic of that original Parasite Eve game. And Wicked Seed is one of such titles – a reimagining of the same general mechanical idea, but done on a much much much tinier budget.
Happy about: CONSCRIPT: Director’s Cut
While Conscript has been out for almost two years now, something about it didn’t quite click with me for the longest time. It’s the type of game that is almost hard to believe is what it actually claims to be, because it feels like it shouldn’t work. A classic survival horror game in the setting of the Great War that doesn’t technically have any supernatural elements and works with the top down perspective? How is that going to work, right? But it does. Not without faltering, of course, but Conscript, in its current updated Director’s Cut version, is a genuinely interesting game and fans of the genre shouldn’t ignore it.
Thoughts on: Darwin’s Paradox!
Making cinematic platformers is hard. The “cinematic” part of it usually means that developers need to introduce enough variety and also fun unexpected twists and moments, while also somehow making sure that the pace of the game feels very tight, with no moments that would drag on. This also means that the best examples of the genre tend to be relatively short experiences, clocking under 4-5 hours if you do things well. Which makes sense – as with a good movie or a theater play, you wouldn’t sit through a longer runtime, it will simply start to get boring. Usually only puzzle-focused type of these games, or outright puzzle platformers, take longer to complete, since those games focus more on systemic puzzle solving, rather than an exciting adventure that keeps on moving. There are well known examples of the genre, from going back to its origins with Another World/Out of this World, to far more recent classics like INSIDE. And people seem to generally like the Little Nightmares titles, even though I find them a bit too boring. There are even some great but more “underground” examples like The MISSING: J.J. Macfield and the Island of Memories.
Darwin’s Paradox!, based on its initial showings and a demo, had a lot of promise. Octopus as the main character, who can stick to surfaces and shoot ink, in itself opened up a lot of possibilities for fun shenanigans, and the American 1950s pulp as the tone seemed really fun too. As I was playing the game’s initial sections I was occasionally frustrated, but always wanted to ignore those annoyances, because the game simply had too much charm. But as I kept playing, the game started dragging on, until by the end I was constantly on the verge of just dropping the game entirely. Which is a real shame.
Happy about: S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Prypiat – Enhanced Edition
Seven years ago I sat down and played through the original three S.T.A.L.K.E.R. titles. Of that playthrough, Call of Prypiat was easily the big highlight. Shadow of Chornobyl was frustrating, if curious. Clear Sky was a slog. But this one? This one was actually cooking. It felt like GSC Game World have finally figured out what the series are supposed to be about, at least as far as my tastes were concerned. So, when I decided to check the Enhanced Edition versions of all games that are part of the Legends of the Zone Trilogy release, I fully expected things to go similarly. I mean, I secretly hoped that the re-releases would fix the first two games as they desperately needed it, but, unfortunately, while the new versions are mostly superior, they didn’t change how messy and frustrating those games are. Call of Prypiat was already good, so is there a point in this re-release? Well, kinda.
Read more“Happy about: S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Prypiat – Enhanced Edition”
Happy about: Legacy of Kain: Defiance Remastered
Being the Legacy of Kain fan that I am, as I’ve covered in my review of Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver 1&2 Remastered last year, I was extremely excited about Defiance. Ever since Soul Reaver 2 still didn’t finish the story started in Soul Reaver 1, people expected the inevitable Soul Reaver 3 (and Defiance was actually known by that name internally at the start). So when the Blood Omen 2 (which hasn’t been remastered yet) was released first, I was slightly confused, but also intrigued. After all, the events of the game contradicted the known timeline, and even the developers vaguely mentioned that something in Defiance would lead to Blood Omen 2 events existing. Then the early PS2 trailer for Defiance (as it was officially unveiled) hit with some cool nu-metal-ish song playing and I downloaded and rewatched that trailer a lot (the track is called “In the Crossfire”, by the way, as I’ve learnt years ago from the best LoK fan site). Playing as both Kain and Raziel in an epic conclusion to the storyline of Raziel (as it would probably be), was such an exciting prospect.
And then the game came out and… I liked it. But it was also weird. It did conclude Raziel’s story in a mostly satisfying way in broad strokes, it left a lot of questions unanswered. But far more importantly – the game felt even more unfinished than Soul Reaver 1, and that game ended with a “To be continued” screen. This feeling is not something that Legacy of Kain: Defiance Remastered can fix, but where it could, the remaster made the game a lot better.