It’s easy to imagine how much pressure BioWare was under as they were making the closing act of the Mass Effect trilogy after the success of the previous two entries. With the first game they’ve established the universe, with the second they’ve refined the gameplay and characters. Third game was supposed to somehow top this and bring the story to a closure. And that’s where they faltered, got confused about how all of this should end. After the incredible scope of Mass Effect and stylish cinematic action of Mass Effect 2, Mass Effect 3 had an identity crisis that it couldn’t quite resolve.
Tag: Highly recommended
Revisiting Mass Effect
Yes, it has been more than 10 years already, hard to believe as it may be, since Mass Effect was originally released. First exclusively on Xbox 360, then, half a year later on PC (PS3 version didn’t come until 2012, though). Despite BioWare setting a new example, a new milestone in how to make story driven RPGs with almost every game prior to this one, it was Mass Effect specifically that became a template for so many games to follow. A cinematic, character and story driven, action and dialogue focused RPG that tried to please varied audience on different platforms without compromising on its values. A game so fresh, yet so distinctively BioWare.
Playing it today on PC it’s easy to see why it was loved and why other games tried to copy it. Also easy to notice things that hasn’t aged well or were not good in the first place.
In love with: The Evil Within 2
When I completed The Evil Within several years ago I felt relieved. It was the kind of relief you have after going through a meeting with a dentist or removing a painful thorn. The “oof, I hope I won’t go through this ever again” kind of relief. Which, if you ask me, is a terrible feel for a game to evoke. Evoking the absolute worst features of a game from Shinji Mikami, it focused on punishing the player way too much, while giving back way too little enjoyment in return. It didn’t just make you question the reality of the events in the game, but also yourself and your choice to play this goddamn game in the first place. It had some amazing ideas, however, and its story DLCs were showing clear understanding of mistakes made in the main game.
When it was announced that there will be a sequel, my only question was “But why?” However, when it became clear that it would be developed by the makers of the aforementioned DLCs, I got curious. For a good reason, it turns out.
Late thoughts on: Life is Strange
The reason I’m writing my opinion on Life is Strange is really simple – I hated my first hour with the game 3 years ago. The writing, the characters, the pacing – it all felt wrong, badly written, all “how do you do fellow kids” and I just quit. But there’s just so much love the game has I tried to guilt trip myself into getting back to it several times. Only now did I completely open myself to going through it as much as I can, and went through the whole game. And I’m actually glad I did.
In love with: Ys VIII: Lacrimosa of DANA
In just 4 years I went from “What’s Ys?” to being a huge fan of these action RPG series by Nihon Falcom that is finally starting to get proper recognition outside of Japan. I didn’t like all games I’ve played so far equally. Origin and the story arc it preludes (covered in I & II) used to be my favorite – it had the perfect version of the gameplay mechanics that the series had in mid-00s, it had really interesting memorable story with good characters and it was quite short and to the point, covering every important and exciting aspect of itself in the best possible way. And I wasn’t super keen on the new gameplay ideas introduced in Ys Seven, the template currently used by the series, so I was a bit cautious about VIII (and still is about IV, which I will play later this year when it’s ported to PC).
Now, some of my concerns and fears were justified. But Ys VIII: Lacrimosa of DANA might be my favorite Ys game so far and one of the best examples of action RPGs I’ve ever seen, both mechanically and narratively.
In love with: Treasure Adventure World
There aren’t that many good examples of a free game turned into a paid product I can think of from the top of the head. Can think of plenty mods turned to paid games, sure. But free games? World of Goo was made from a free Experimental Gameplay Project title that simply had the same basic mechanics and looks. Super Win the Game is more of a successor to the free You Have to Win the Game. Only La-Mulana, Spelunky and maybe Eversion feel like actual “remakes”, which follow a more or less same structure as their original free counterpart but with updates. I suppose, Cave Story can somehow fit this list too. But point is – not that many I can think of, and, interestingly, almost all of them are somewhat metroidvania-ish.
Treasure Adventure Game is a free exploration-focused platformer with Zelda and Metroid influences that was released about 6 and a half years ago. I stumbled upon it due to it being featured on GOG and had a blast playing it 6 years ago. Then about a year later a remake was announced. Treasure Adventure World is a higher resolution, higher fidelity remake, with minor updates and several pacing changes, but overall unchanged design. For better and worse.
In love with: CHUCHEL
Amanita Design have tried their hand at different extremes of adventure game design – they’ve made games focusing on Puzzles (Machinarium being the most puzzle-centric), and they’ve made games that are more like fun toys, digital art installations (original Samorost being one). But what was constant throughout all their titles, no matter the focus, is the humour, the style, the charm, the character – all just oozing from both the visual and audio design of their games. You didn’t honestly expect CHUCHEL to become a disappointing exception in that, did you?
No, this is Amanita Design doing what they do best, this time again going closer to that digital toy-ish design of the very first game they’ve developed.
Happy about: Zero Escape Trilogy
I’ve been curious about what became Zero Escape Trilogy for a while now. Original 999 (Nine Hours, Nine Persons, Nine Doors) was released back in 2009 on Nintendo DS to very positive reviews on how it tackled the mix of visual novel and “escape the room” puzzles, while also using it’s branching narrative, common for visual novels, as a plot point for many worlds interpretation influenced plot. It was also one of the first attempts, to my knowledge, to bring the Cube (the movie) ideas to video game format, mixing horror, thriller and mystery novel and becoming somewhat of the “What if Cube, Saw and Agatha Christie’s “And Then There Were None” were anime”. Virtue’s Last Reward followed 3 years later on PS Vita and 3DS, and then in 2016 Zero Time Dilemma was released as a final chapter of the plot on the same systems, but also on PC. However, it wasn’t until Zero Escape: The Nonary Games release last year, that updated and re-released the first two games in one package, that I finally had a chance to check on them.
O tempora: System Shock 2
O tempora is a series of retrospective posts where I play games from ages before to see if they stood the test of time.
This has been a long time coming. I’ve attempted to play System Shock 2 ever since 2001, when I first got my own modern (for the time) PC. And even back then, just few years after the game release, it already worked with issues. After that for the longest all games on this in-house game engine made by Looking Glass Studios, along with the Thief 1 and 2, were borderline unplayable on most PCs. Until one day a mysterious person (often believed to be one of the ex-Looking Glass employees), released an updated version of the source code of the engine, which made things work again. Ever since then, all 3 games on the Dark Engine have been receiving updates and fixes making games not just playable again, but often better than they were originally. And several years since I had a chance to replay all the Thief titles and a year and a half since I’ve first experienced the innovative undying beauty of the original System Shock, I finally had the chance to finish System Shock 2. And I can sum up my experience in a very short review: Wow…
For more in-depth analysis, read on. :)
In love with: HITMAN – Game of the Year Edition
Hitman series are 17 years old by now. They started out with Codename 47, a PC-exclusive fresh new take on the freeform stealth ideas introduced in Thief: The Dark Project. Where instead of stealth, it focused on “social stealth” and blending in, and instead of stealing, on the art of killing. Despite all the flaws, like unnecessary action-focused missions, incredibly simplistic concept of blending in with no in-between states of suspicion, and less complex AI patterns than the ones you get today, it remains an amazing game, with some of the best missions in the entire series (like “Traditions of the Trade” or “The Massacre at Cheung Chau Fish Restaurant”). Of course, most of the good stuff has been later remade in Hitman: Contracts, which might as well be considered the proper start of the series (Hitman 2 also being rather rough), which finally realized that pure stealth and pure action sequences just don’t fit the series. And Blood Money remains one of the best examples of the stealth games to this day.
Then we had Hitman: Absolution, which was… well… It was a rather cool stealth action game, but a terrible Hitman game. A linear, story-driven game, where social stealth and blending in usually worked against you, since most of the time being dressed as someone you want to blend in with meant higher of getting noticed. But a lot of the ideas and concepts introduced in that game were great, ready to be taken, modified and perfected to work in a proper Hitman game. And that’s what the game, simply called HITMAN, is – best ideas from all the previous games in one package. And then some.